The BMW M240i xDrive arrives as a rear‑biased sports coupe priced at £50,215, while the Audi RS3 starts just above £60,000, positioning the German duo as direct competitors in the hot‑hatch segment.
Price and core specifications
Both models claim roughly 400 bhp, but the BMW reaches 387 bhp with a 48‑volt mild‑hybrid boost, and the Audi lists 394 bhp from its 2.5‑litre five‑cylinder. Torque figures sit at 398 lb‑ft for the BMW and 369 lb‑ft for the Audi. The BMW accelerates to 62 mph in 4.3 seconds; the Audi’s official time is close, though exact figures vary by market.
Exterior design language
The M240i’s silhouette echoes classic BMW coupe cues, yet its angles feel slightly awkward compared with the Audi’s aggressive Kyalami Green hatch. The RS3 sports vented arches, a wide front grille and optional carbon wing, while the BMW relies on a more subdued roofline and modest spoiler.
Cabin layout and materials
Inside the BMW, a curved digital display dominates the dash, but many controls sit behind touch‑sensitive panels. Oyster‑leather seats sit beside carbon‑fibre trim, and the steering wheel features an oversized rim with a red stripe at 12 o’clock. The Audi offers optional sport bucket seats with higher side‑bolstering, and a steering wheel that includes two red performance buttons.
Powertrain architecture
The M240i uses BMW’s CLAR platform with a longitudinal inline‑six and rear‑biased xDrive system. Its 48‑volt system adds 18 bhp and shifts the power peak 300 rpm earlier, now arriving at 5,200 rpm. The Audi’s five‑cylinder sits in a front‑engine, all‑wheel‑drive layout, delivering peak power at 5,600 rpm.
Power: 387 bhp (BMW) vs 394 bhp (Audi). Torque: 398 lb‑ft vs 369 lb‑ft. Weight: 1,755 kg for the BMW, about 190 kg heavier than the RS3. 0‑62 mph: 4.3 s (BMW) – comparable to the RS3’s claimed time.
Read Also: Alpina’s B8 GT is its most powerful model yet
Transmission and handling
The BMW pairs an eight‑speed torque‑converter automatic with selectable sport settings that tighten suspension and steering without becoming harsh. The Audi relies on a seven‑speed dual‑clutch gearbox that feels marginally quicker in shifts, though both require the driver to engage a manual mode for full control.
Why the price gap matters
Buyers face a decision between the M240i’s lower entry cost and the RS3’s more aggressive hardware. The extra £10,000‑plus for the Audi translates into a lighter chassis, a more responsive gearbox, and a distinct engine note that many enthusiasts find thrilling.
Dynamic performance on the road
On winding country lanes, the BMW’s rear‑biased xDrive delivers predictable balance, allowing the driver to steer with confidence. The Audi’s torque‑splitter differential can send up to 100 percent of power to the outer rear wheel, producing a sharper turn‑in that feels more planted at the limit.
Tyre and brake characteristics
The RS3 fits 265‑section Pirelli P Zero Rs up front, providing high mechanical grip, while the BMW uses 225‑section Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6s that tend to smear under heavy load. Carbon‑ceramic brakes on the Audi bite aggressively but can be unforgiving, whereas the BMW’s steel brakes offer more modulation.
Overall driving feel
Drivers note that the BMW’s steering feels lighter and more natural, with a linear power delivery that reaches the red line without harshness. The Audi’s five‑cylinder produces a louder, higher‑rev character that some describe as “naughty” and “angry,” delivering a more visceral experience at the cost of increased vibration.
In the end, the M240i presents a compelling value proposition: a capable sports coupe that delivers near‑RS3 performance for a fraction of the price, while the RS3 remains the flagship hot hatch with sharper trends and a more distinctive engine soundtrack.
